Tuning in the presence of matching

From Wiki Les Houches 09

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Chart the problem. Determine some Classic Examples)
(Removing all content from page)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
'''Interested parties''': , ''Piergiulio Lenzi, Vitaliano Ciulli, Peter Skands, Leif Lonnblad, Simon Platzer, Jon Butterworth, Jeppe Anderson, Mario Campanelli, Markus Warsinsky, Matthew Schwartz, Peter Loch, Dieter Zeppenfeld, Giacinto Piacquadio, Paulo Francovilla +...''
 
-
== Chart the problem. Determine some Classic Examples ==
 
-
 
-
[http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?eprint=arXiv:0903.3918 Effect of ME corrections] on low pT end of the Z pT distribution compared for PYTHIA, HERWIG, Sherpa, Alpgen. Some points:
 
-
* Affect n=1 ME corrections, Pythia, Herwig, Alpgen+Herwig and Sherpa all pretty much agree. For Algen+Pythia there is a significant difference at low pT. Means that PYTHIA tune would be different for usage with & without Alpgen.
 
-
 
-
PL slide to be linked here.
 
-
 
-
== Influence of UE on matching and vice versa ==
 
-
 
-
How would low x logs affect tunes?
 
-
 
-
Expect extra events at with high rapidity jets due to:
 
-
* large colour singlet contribution. This will have a component with rapidity gaps, and a component where these gaps have been destroyed by UE.
 
-
* large colour octet contribution enhanced by low x logs (Jeppes's calculations).
 
-
Presumably these effects will distort min bias tunes etc, since this physics is not necessarily in the MC. The first effect actually can be modelled by HERWIG+JIMMY, to some extent at least.
 
-
 
-
 
-
Not: addressed:
 
-
 
-
* How dependent on matching strategy?
 
-
 
-
* Are there ways of revamping pre-matched tunes?
 

Revision as of 13:29, 13 June 2009

Personal tools