Dirac Gauginos

From Wiki Les Houches 09

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (14:31, 25 June 2009) (view source)
 
(5 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 7: Line 7:
Adam Martin
Adam Martin
-
Tuhin S Roy(tuhin@uoregon.edu)
+
Tuhin S Roy(tuhin.AT.uoregon.edu)
-
Benjamin Fuks (fuks@cern.ch)
+
Benjamin Fuks (fuks.AT.cern.ch)
-
Patrick Fox (pjfox@fnal.gov)
+
Patrick Fox (pjfox.AT.fnal.gov)
Conor  Henderson
Conor  Henderson
-
List of topics is below:
+
Graham Kribs
 +
Siba Prasad Das
 +
 +
Renaud Bruneliere
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
'''List of topics is below:
 +
'''
* '''Monte Carlo implementation:''' cross-check of the current MG/ME and CalcHEP implementations, implementation into FeynRules  
* '''Monte Carlo implementation:''' cross-check of the current MG/ME and CalcHEP implementations, implementation into FeynRules  
Line 25: Line 34:
== 1.) low mass point, essentially a Diracified version of the SPSXX points. Attempt to match/maximize the rates. Aim for largest differences between Dirac and Majorana gauginos.
== 1.) low mass point, essentially a Diracified version of the SPSXX points. Attempt to match/maximize the rates. Aim for largest differences between Dirac and Majorana gauginos.
-
(Patrick, Renaud)
+
(Patrick, Benjamin)
== 2.) high mass points: using unification to reduce the dimension of the parameter space.
== 2.) high mass points: using unification to reduce the dimension of the parameter space.
-
(Patrick, Tuhin)
+
(Patrick, Tuhin, Benjamin)
* '''Determining Majorana vs. Dirac character of gauginos:'''  
* '''Determining Majorana vs. Dirac character of gauginos:'''  

Current revision

DIRAC GAUGINOS:


Please sign your name and email address up to the projects you are interested in.

Adam Martin

Tuhin S Roy(tuhin.AT.uoregon.edu)

Benjamin Fuks (fuks.AT.cern.ch)

Patrick Fox (pjfox.AT.fnal.gov)

Conor Henderson

Graham Kribs

Siba Prasad Das

Renaud Bruneliere



List of topics is below:

  • Monte Carlo implementation: cross-check of the current MG/ME and CalcHEP implementations, implementation into FeynRules

(Adam, Tuhin, Claude, Benjamin, Patrick)

  • Benchmarks:

== 1.) low mass point, essentially a Diracified version of the SPSXX points. Attempt to match/maximize the rates. Aim for largest differences between Dirac and Majorana gauginos.

(Patrick, Benjamin)

== 2.) high mass points: using unification to reduce the dimension of the parameter space.

(Patrick, Tuhin, Benjamin)

  • Determining Majorana vs. Dirac character of gauginos:

Possible techniques/ideas can be found in "0808.2410" and "0811.4445"

(Adam, Tuhin)

  • Looking at the signal into experiments and implementing benchmark points

(Renaud for ATLAS)

Feel free to add more ideas. Any questions, email "adam.martin@yale.edu" "tuhin@uoregon@yale.edu"

Personal tools