Dirac Gauginos

From Wiki Les Houches 09

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (14:31, 25 June 2009) (view source)
 
(32 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
'''Dirac Gauginos:'''
+
'''DIRAC GAUGINOS:'''
-
List of topics is below, please sign your name up to the projects you are interested in:
+
----
-
* Monte Carlo implementation: cross-check of the current MG/ME and CalcHEP implementations, implementation into FeynRules (Adam)
+
Please sign your name and email address up to the projects you are interested in.
-
* Benchmarks:
+
Adam Martin
-
    1.) low mass point, essentially a Diracified version of the SPSXX points. Attempt to match/maximize the rates. Aim for largest differences between Dirac and Majorana gauginos.
+
-
    2.) other points, more UV-theory driven?
+
-
* Determining Majorana vs. Dirac character of gauginos: Possible techniques/ideas can be found in
+
Tuhin S Roy(tuhin.AT.uoregon.edu)
-
[http://arxiv.org/abs/0808.2410] and [http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.4445]
+
-
* Dirac gauginos and chargino NLSPs: [http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.4936] (Adam)
+
Benjamin Fuks (fuks.AT.cern.ch)
-
* Scalar adjoints (i.e sgluons) [http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3919]
+
Patrick Fox (pjfox.AT.fnal.gov)
 +
 
 +
Conor  Henderson
 +
 
 +
Graham Kribs
 +
 
 +
Siba Prasad Das
 +
 
 +
Renaud Bruneliere
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''List of topics is below:
 +
'''
 +
* '''Monte Carlo implementation:''' cross-check of the current MG/ME and CalcHEP implementations, implementation into FeynRules
 +
 
 +
(Adam, Tuhin, Claude, Benjamin, Patrick)
 +
 
 +
* '''Benchmarks:'''
 +
 +
== 1.) low mass point, essentially a Diracified version of the SPSXX points. Attempt to match/maximize the rates. Aim for largest differences between Dirac and Majorana gauginos.
 +
 
 +
(Patrick, Benjamin)
 +
 
 +
== 2.) high mass points: using unification to reduce the dimension of the parameter space.
 +
 
 +
(Patrick, Tuhin, Benjamin)
 +
 
 +
* '''Determining Majorana vs. Dirac character of gauginos:'''
 +
 
 +
Possible techniques/ideas can be found in
 +
[http://arxiv.org/abs/0808.2410,"0808.2410"] and [http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.4445,"0811.4445"]
 +
 
 +
* '''Dirac gauginos and chargino NLSPs:''' [http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.4936,"0807.4936"]
 +
 
 +
(Adam, Tuhin)
 +
 
 +
* '''Scalar adjoints (i.e sgluons)''' [http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3919,"0810.3919"]
 +
 
 +
* '''Looking at the signal into experiments and implementing benchmark points'''
 +
(Renaud for ATLAS)
 +
 
 +
Feel free to add more ideas. Any questions, email [mailto:adam.martin@yale.edu, "adam.martin@yale.edu"]
 +
[mailto:tuhin@uoregon.edu, "tuhin@uoregon@yale.edu"]

Current revision

DIRAC GAUGINOS:


Please sign your name and email address up to the projects you are interested in.

Adam Martin

Tuhin S Roy(tuhin.AT.uoregon.edu)

Benjamin Fuks (fuks.AT.cern.ch)

Patrick Fox (pjfox.AT.fnal.gov)

Conor Henderson

Graham Kribs

Siba Prasad Das

Renaud Bruneliere



List of topics is below:

  • Monte Carlo implementation: cross-check of the current MG/ME and CalcHEP implementations, implementation into FeynRules

(Adam, Tuhin, Claude, Benjamin, Patrick)

  • Benchmarks:

== 1.) low mass point, essentially a Diracified version of the SPSXX points. Attempt to match/maximize the rates. Aim for largest differences between Dirac and Majorana gauginos.

(Patrick, Benjamin)

== 2.) high mass points: using unification to reduce the dimension of the parameter space.

(Patrick, Tuhin, Benjamin)

  • Determining Majorana vs. Dirac character of gauginos:

Possible techniques/ideas can be found in "0808.2410" and "0811.4445"

(Adam, Tuhin)

  • Looking at the signal into experiments and implementing benchmark points

(Renaud for ATLAS)

Feel free to add more ideas. Any questions, email "adam.martin@yale.edu" "tuhin@uoregon@yale.edu"

Personal tools