Block SMINPUTS

From Wiki Les Houches 09

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(wiki issues moved to the main discussion page)
Line 4: Line 4:
:well the idea is that we are just defining new blocks. SMINPUTS is an old SLHA block and we have no intention of altering it. On the other hand, that block may well in the input or output file of a given flavour program. There is no reason why the input/output files should not contain a mixture of SLHA and FLHA blocks. But you have a point that it might be confusing to have the block in the proposal. We should make clear that we are not redefining it.
:well the idea is that we are just defining new blocks. SMINPUTS is an old SLHA block and we have no intention of altering it. On the other hand, that block may well in the input or output file of a given flavour program. There is no reason why the input/output files should not contain a mixture of SLHA and FLHA blocks. But you have a point that it might be confusing to have the block in the proposal. We should make clear that we are not redefining it.
-
 
-
::Now, a few organizational issues. I am sorry for being pedantic but - in the interest of a healthy development of this wiki-project - we should acquire a few good wiki-habits. First of all, your comment concerns a specific block, so it should appear in the page of that block. I will move this paragraph to the right location. Second, your signature did not appear correctly. You just have to type four tildas (~) at the end of your message and they will be automatically translated into your username and a time stamp. Finally, another good wiki habit - but this is just a suggestion for the future - is to parse the contributions to a discussion thread by starting each paragraph with an appropriate number of colons (:) as I did in the last two paragraphs. Cheers [[User:Slavich|slavich]] 13:12, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
Pietro, could you please move the wiki instructions to the main discussion page? [[User:Nazila|Nazila]] 13:55, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 14:45, 25 June 2009

Back to Main Page

First of all I apologize if I repeat things, which you might already have discussed. I could not attend the meeting on June 24. I suggest not to put the BLOCK SMINPUTS in the current proposal, since it already exists in the SLHA. Is there maybe a special reason why you put it in the current proposal? Muehllei 13:20, June 25, 2009.

well the idea is that we are just defining new blocks. SMINPUTS is an old SLHA block and we have no intention of altering it. On the other hand, that block may well in the input or output file of a given flavour program. There is no reason why the input/output files should not contain a mixture of SLHA and FLHA blocks. But you have a point that it might be confusing to have the block in the proposal. We should make clear that we are not redefining it.
Personal tools